Silicone Gel Breast Implants – Report of the Independent Review Group, 1998
In response to concerns expressed by women about a possible link between silicone gel breast implants and health problems, the British Minister of Health asked the Chief Medical Officer to conduct a review of the use of silicone gel breast implants in the United Kingdom. The Chief Medical Officer addressed this request by setting up an Independent Review Group (IRG).
The IRG was given the responsibility of reviewing the evidence relating to possible health risks associated with silicone gel breast implants. The members of the group were selected for their independent views, their knowledge and understanding of the issues, and their lack of any invested interest in the conclusions reached. The members and advisors of the group included a cell biologist, epidemiologist, histopathologist, internist, immunologist, lawyer, medical microbiologist, pathologist, plastic surgeon, rheumatologist, and toxicologist. The IRG evaluated an extensive literature, and took evidence from expert witnesses, patients, patient groups, clinicians, lawyers, manufacturers, and scientists. They gathered evidence from experts in the United Kingdom and overseas.
By the time this report was published in 1998, the IRG had evaluated both the existing and emerging scientific evidence for a link between silicone gel breast implants and adverse effects on health. In addition, they gathered evidence on the quality and quantity of information routinely provided to women considering breast augmentation.
The IRG:
– Reviewed the existing medical reports and evidence
– Identified and considered new evidence
– Considered the possible existence of a new, undefined syndrome
– Considered the range of risks associated with silicone gel breast implants
– Examined whether patient information is satisfactory
– Considered how good clinical practice can be assured
The IRG considered evidence from a number of sources:
– Oral evidence from representatives of patient groups, lawyers, researchers, physicians, plastic surgeons, manufacturers, and the National Breast Implant Registry.
– Written evidence from women with breast implants, replies to requests for information, and additional information from those who gave oral evidence.
– Plaintiff and defense submissions to the scientific panel appointed to review the scientific merits of evidence presented in litigation in the United States
– Unpublished scientific information, legal submissions, letters from women with silicone gel breast implants, internet and press articles
– Scientific publications
– Data provided by implant manufacturers.
The IRG reached a number of important conclusions:
1. There is no histopathological or conclusive immunological evidence for an abnormal immune response to silicone from breast implants in tissue.
2. There is no epidemiological evidence for any link between silicone gel breast implants and any established connective tissue disease. If there is a risk of connective tissue disease, it is too small to be quantified. The IRG cannot justify recommending further epidemiological studies to investigate this hypothesis.
3. Good evidence for the existence of atypical connective tissue disease or undefined conditions such as ‘silicone poisoning’ is lacking. It is possible that other conditions such as low-grade chronic infection may account for some of the non-specific illnesses noted in some women with silicone gel breast implants.
4. The overall biological response to silicone is consistent with conventional forms of response to foreign materials, rather than an unusual toxic reaction.
5. There is no evidence that children of women with breast implants are at increased risk of connective tissue disease.
6. The IRG recognized that there were issues such as the precise incidence of rupture where the scientific data were incomplete so that rigorous conclusions could not be drawn.
The IRG noted several additional observations:
– There are physical and psychological benefits of breast implantation for many women.
– There are a number of complications such as capsular contracture and gel bleed associated with breast implantation.
– Information provided to women to assist them in making informed decisions about whether to proceed with breast implant surgery is frequently inadequate, in terms of broke both quality and quantity.
– There is a need to extend the principles of good clinical practice and clinical audit across some areas of the private sector
– There is a need to improve scientific quality in a number of areas of research relating to aspects of silicone gel breast implants.
To address these areas of concern, the IRG made several recommendations.
more to come
Hi Crystal,Thanks for writing, and for visiting. I’m so sorry you have to go through all of this! Have you thought about getting a second opinion? I can’t tell you how important it is to get a second and sometimes third or fourth opinion to make sure you and your doctors are on the same path, not to mention the right path for you! I just had pretty major surgery repairing a failure in my reconstruction, that surgery was two weeks ago tomorrow. I can’t even think about nipple reconstruction until we find out if this repair “takes”. If it doesn’t we’ll have to start all over again, and the nipple reconstruction would be a waste of time. But I HAVE thought about it a lot! At first I didn’t think I would want it at all. Tissue expanders are so strange and unreal that it really didn’t seem like sticking fake nipples on would be smart; the breasts looked so weird. I thought why bother? But now I have a much more natural look and would like to have nipple reconstruction. I have had two plastic surgeons. The first wanted to do a little twist of the skin on my breasts to make “bug bite” sized nipples, then tattoo the color around them. My new plastic surgeon does nipple reconstruction by doing skin grafts from the area right next to the labial area. I have seen a lot of photos of nipple tattoos and personally haven’t been thrilled with them, but I know a lot of women that have had it done and are happy. I have seen just a few photos of skin grafted nipples and I’m astounded by how great they look. However, the skin twist/tattoo method is easier by far, and the skin graft in your pubic area is tremendously painful. But it heals quickly, and it gives great results. I’m not 100% sold on it yet. I have a lot of questions for my new doctor, but I’m guessing I will end up with skin grafted nipples. Nipple reconstruction is an individual choice, and many plastic surgeons only do it one or two ways, so you might be at the mercy of the surgeon you pick. I hope this has helped, and please feel free to email or write any time! Take care, and best wishes with everything.